There were a multitude of independent churches after Jesus resurrection, each of which had its own set of recognized writings, each of which was under its own independent bishop or leader and each had its own stand on the questions - whether Jesus was or was not the one who was crucified; about the nature of #Jesus Christ, that is, whether he was God, man, or some combination of them; for the nature of God, ie. Trinity as a formulation, indivisibility of God, duality, and the like. All these issues today are subject to debate and in Islam, as they were subject to debate at that time.
A few centuries after Jesus, these questions began to be resolved and the traditional understanding of the Christian belief began to appear.
According to the concept of his physical birth, Jesus was considered as the only-begotten Son of God through the virgin Mary, who opened the covenant of Allah for all mankind, the one who was to govern Jews and non-Jews, the one who was crucified for forgiving the sins of mankind , before supposedly being resurrected from the dead.
Adrian Thatcher wrote: "The question is whether there is hardly a New Testament scholar who is ready to defend the view that the four cases of use of 'I am' in John, or in most other places can be historically attributed to Jesus."
David Brown stated: "There is solid evidence that Jesus never saw himself as an object of worship. It is impossible to base on any claim for the divinity of Christ at this moment when we leave the traditional display, as seen in the literal understanding of the Gospel of John. "But he says:" It is not logical to assume that the human mind may be aware of his own divinity. "Brian Heblevate admits:" It is no longer possible to defend the divinity of Jesus by referring to Jesus' claims. "Sanders wrote:" Often the repeated assertion that Jesus put himself in the place of God "are exaggerated.
Comments